Editorial methodology

A method for
honest uncertainty.

Biohacker exists to make evidence more useful without making it sound more certain than it is.

Our methodology applies to public articles, premium analysis, course material, and certification assessments.
01

Primary sources before summaries

Claims are traced to the study, regulator, or original dataset whenever possible.

02

Evidence types stay separate

Human trials, observational data, animal research, mechanisms, and anecdotes are never presented as equivalent.

03

Uncertainty remains visible

Limitations, conflicts, missing endpoints, and contradictory findings are part of the conclusion.

04

Safety cannot be premium

Material risks, contraindications, approval status, and escalation guidance remain publicly visible.

05

Every review has a version

Published, reviewed, corrected, and superseded dates create an auditable research history.

06

Independence is disclosed

No paid rankings, supplier commissions, or hidden incentives shape the research catalogue.

Evidence labels
FOUNDATIONALHUMAN EVIDENCEEARLY HUMANPRECLINICALMIXED EVIDENCESAFETY CORE